beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.10.22 2014고단1725

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the defendant.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. Defendant A

A. From March 9, 2014 to March 27, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) installed five secret rooms, shower rooms, one employee waiting room, and three CCTVs for external surveillance.

Furthermore, if the defendant employs K, who is a woman engaged in sexual traffic, receives 100,000 won from a cryptive sidewalk, and received 10,000 won from a male guest once, and let the above sexual traffic female to stimulate the sexual organ part of the customer by using a cryptive day, etc., the defendant made a similar cryptive behavior by using a cryptive machine, or made a sales amounting to 100,000 won per day by allowing the sexual intercourse with the customer.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging commercial sex acts.

(b) No person who violates the School Health Act shall commit any act prohibited in school environmental sanitation and cleanup zones;

Nevertheless, from March 9, 2014 to March 27, 2014, the Defendant was engaged in similar intercourse activities with five smuggling equipped with the beds of “J” from March 9, 2014, as seen above, from March 27, 2014.

Accordingly, the defendant committed prohibited acts in school environmental sanitation and cleanup zone.

C. On March 28, 2014, the Defendant: (a) within the “J” located in the first and second floor of Silung-si I and second floor of Silung-si; (b) was punished for the operation of a sexual traffic business establishment; (c) was bound if the Defendant was in operation of the J; and (d) was sentenced to a fine even if he stated that he was operated by the first offender; (c) was sentenced to a fine; and (d) the Defendant asked B to make a false statement by requesting B to “a statement as he operated by the first offender instead of a fine.” (d) the Defendant had B make the said sexual traffic case at the office of Silung Police Station on April 3, 2014.