On September 6, 2017, the Defendant appeared to take an oath as a witness for a special injury case against Defendant C in Changwon District Court No. 201, Jinyang-si, Jinyang-si, 303 around 16:0, Jinju-si, Jin-si, Jin-si, 303, and testified, the Defendant issued a false testimony by stating that “The above facts are, despite the fact that C had been on March 28, 2017, around 23:05, when the victim’s left snow part of the victim’s body from the E main point located in Jin-si, Jin-si, Jin-si, Sin-si, Sin-si, Sin-si, Sin-si, Sin-si, Sin-si, 303.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Copy of the statement made by the police against the defendant;

1. A copy of a photograph of the damaged part, or a copy of an on-site photograph;

1. Copy of protocol concerning the examination of suspect C by the police; and

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each copy of examination protocol;

1. Relevant Article 152 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Reasons for sentencing Article 153 of the Criminal Act to mitigate confessions;

1. The measure of recommending the application of the sentencing criteria: A confession made between January and October (the area of mitigation):

2. The criminal defendant who is a victim of special injury and has made a false testimony contrary to the statement made by the police in order to be acquitted in a situation where there is no other important evidence in the criminal trial, in addition to the statement made by the defendant in the criminal trial;

In addition, the punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of all the sentencing conditions specified in the pleadings of the instant case, such as the age, sex, environment, background, means and result of the instant case, and the circumstances after the crime.