However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 20, 2013, the Defendant received a summary order of a fine of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act from the Suwon District Court as a matter of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

On October 21, 2019, at around 22:30, the Defendant driven C Poter Cargo Vehicles with the blood alcohol concentration of about 0.106% from the 5km section to the front road of Pyeongtaek-si.

As a result, the defendant violated the prohibition of drunk driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of the result of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records, etc. inquiry reports and investigation reports (attached to a summary order of the same kind of power);

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime, or the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The execution of imprisonment with prison labor shall be suspended in consideration of the fact that the defendant with the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act includes only one time a fine for drunk driving and has no record of the crime or heavier than a fine for other crimes, and an incidental disposition shall be imposed to prevent the second offense;