2. Although there are no circumstances that may be considered in light of the circumstances, such as the Defendant’s confession of the instant crime and his mistake by means of confinement life, etc., and the fact that the size of the instant game room is relatively large and the period of operation is not long, the crime related to illegal game products requires strict punishment due to serious social harm, such as encouraging the general public to commit an excessive speculative spirit and hindering sound labor, etc. The Defendant has a history of having been punished several times as well as the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime due to the same kind of crime, and the Defendant committed the instant crime again during the period of repeated crime due to the same crime. Comprehensively taking into account all the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant case, such as the balance with other similar cases, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, the motive and circumstance of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the Defendant’s above assertion is unreasonable as it is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.