beta
부산지방법원동부지원 2015.08.11 2014가단18393

손해배상(기) 등

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The following facts are acknowledged in accordance with the facts finding that there is no dispute between the parties, or according to the entries in the evidence Nos. 1, 2, 1, 2 of the evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 1, 2 of the evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 2 of this Court, the Busan Busan Metropolitan City Shipping Department chief

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of Busan Shipping Daegu Apartment 102 Dong-dong 801 (hereinafter “Plaintiff-owned building”) and resides in the above building. The Defendant is also the owner of the above-story 901 (hereinafter “Defendant-owned building”).

B. On April 23, 2014, both the Defendant and his wife were living in the building owned by the Defendant, but the fire occurred in the building owned by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant fire”), and on the wind that flow a large quantity of water generated in the course of extinguishing a fire into the lower floor, the building owned by the Plaintiff was damaged by flood damage, namely, remote areas, bags, furniture, or electronic equipment.

2. The plaintiff asserts that since the fire in this case occurred due to the management of electrical products with the defendant's care, the defendant is responsible for compensating the plaintiff for the damages caused by the fire in this case.

(A) The plaintiff filed a claim for damages due to the defect in the installation or preservation of a structure, but withdrawn the above assertion on the sixth day for pleading. However, it is insufficient to recognize that the result of each fact inquiry on the Busan Busan Metropolitan City Shipping Department chief and the Busan Shipping Authority chief of the Busan Shipping Authority alone was negligent in managing the electrical product. The contents of the fact inquiry results are deemed to have been damaged the middle part of the electric sets immediately below the living room, etc. of the building owned by the defendant, and thus, it is difficult to find out the cause of fire clearly, but there is no possibility of fire.

b) the Commission;