2. There are extenuating circumstances such as the fact that the defendant's mistake is divided in depth, that the defendant has no record of being sentenced to imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment, that there is no record of being sentenced to imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment for the defendant, that the defendant's above crime does not affect the result of the trial, and that the defendant is in an economically spared wife.

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s act of committing the instant case brought a confusion in the trial proceedings in the instant case; and (b) the Defendant’s act of causing considerable loss to the national judicial function; and (c) the Defendant’s age, character, character, environment, motive and background of committing the instant case, means and method of committing the instant case; and (d) circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the argument and the record, such as the circumstances after committing the instant crime, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable

3. Conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.