beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.06.05 2019노271

업무방해

Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor of the summary of the grounds for appeal, in particular G’s statement, the file properties of the contract, and the confirmation of T- Fact, the instant contract may be deemed to be duly formed, and accordingly, the Defendant may be recognized as having the right to manage the victimized company, and the lower court acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged even though the Defendant

2. Evidence duly adopted and examined by the judgment of the court below and the trial court, and in particular, the witness J of the court below stated that "in preparing the confirmation document of this case, F, the representative director of the damaged company, without the seal of the damaged company, has written his signature on the confirmation document of this case" (as to the preparation of the confirmation document of this case, the witness I of the court below stated that "the seal of the damaged company was already affixed to the contract of this case" (as to the contract of this case (as to the 302 pages of the trial record), unlike the contract of this case, the witness's statement of the circumstance where the representative director, who is not the seal of the damaged company, was signed on the confirmation document of this case, is natural; ② the entrustment contract of this case was written with the electrical safety supervisor's prior notification on March 11, 2015, not with the contract of this case, with the date of preparation " January 2015," and it is difficult to be deemed that the entrustment contract of this case was prepared as the first 20th anniversary of the entrustment contract of this case contract of this case.