2. The plaintiffs' assertion;

3. The grounds for this part are stated by the court of first instance, and each of the "this court" in the 2 to 3 acts at the bottom of the 8th judgment of the court of first instance and the 3rd acts at the bottom of the 2 to 21 acts at the bottom of the 8th judgment of the court of

C. 2) The part of paragraph (2) is the same as the entries in paragraphs 1 through 3 of the part on the grounds of the judgment of the first instance except for the following modifications. Thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. 【The part to be used after the completion

C. (2) 2) Further to the above facts of recognition, in light of the following circumstances acknowledged by comprehensively taking into account the evidence and the overall purport of the arguments as seen above, the deceased was admitted to the Defendant hospital in the status of receiving more than two scarke cancers and radiation treatment on the scarkes and scarkes, and the Defendant hospital’s medical personnel conducted scarkesing surgery through scarkes and scarkesing surgery from scarkes and medical personnel, and conducted scarkesing surgery on the left side and scarkesing surgery on the left side from scarkes and medical personnel, and thereafter, the deceased was in a state of high risk of damage of the tissue in the surgery department and exposure to the scarkes.

In such a case, even if the Defendant hospital’s medical team plans and implements the treatment of infection infection after surgery, it is recognized that there was an error of negligence (hereinafter “the medical malpractice of this case”) by neglecting the treatment, even though it should have verified the parts of the deceased’s wife and whether there was any abnormal symptoms in the process of performing the above treatment.

If a infection occurs on the part of a chest sule, it shall be caused by a sule.