The lower court upheld the first instance judgment that found all of the facts charged of the instant case guilty.

The judgment below

Examining the grounds for appeal in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the intent of destruction in the crime of damage to property, whether an act is a justifiable act, or the meaning of “land access” as referred to in general traffic obstruction,

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.