However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2015. 3. 19. 21:10 경 성남시 수정구 B 건물 가동 102호에 있는 피고인의 주거지 내에서, 피고인의 딸인 아동인 피해자 C( 여, 15세) 이 자신에게 짜증 내며 말 대답을 하고 가운데 손가락을 이용하여 욕을 하자, 주먹과 손바닥으로 피해자의 머리와 빰을 4~5 회 때리고, 방 안으로 도망한 피해자에게 신발장 서랍에 들어 있던 망치를 들고 쫓아갔으나 다른 가족들이 말리자, 손으로 피해자의 목을 잡아 벽에 밀치고, 주먹으로 피해자의 머리와 얼굴을 때리고, 손으로 피해자의 머리채를 잡아 흔들었다.

As a result, the Defendant committed abusive acts that inflict bodily harm on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, and Articles 71(1)2 and 77 subparag. 3 of the Act on the Place of Child Uniforms for the Selection of Punishment, and Articles 17 subparag. 3 of the Imprisonment (the defendant does not have the record of violent crimes against living together, children living together, and victimized children, and the defendant has exercised several violences against home protection cases, refusing to entrust counseling and medical treatment in a home protection case, and the case was prosecuted as a criminal case, and refusing to sentence and fine in this Act after prosecution, and there is a serious anti-discrimination such as refusing to sentence and fine in this Act;

Considering that it is difficult to see, such as the fact that it is dangerous to the victimized child, the fact that it is dangerous to the victimized child, etc.

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (a point agreed with the victim);

1. To observe orders to protect and attend lectures and to prevent recidivism under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;