When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

around 01:05 on September 5, 2019, the Defendant drinking alcohol at “C” main points located in Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si, and came to pay a trial cost due to D and alcohol value, which is the main place of the said main place of business. Accordingly, upon reporting to D 112, G, such as the background F belonging to E zone belonging to the Gyeongcheon-si Police Station E zone, was dispatched to the said main place.

When the Defendant heard that he would return to the Republic of Korea from G who was called to pay and return home from the above circumstances in the above state of the C at the above time, the Defendant assaulted G with the floor of the said G, such as “We are the prosecution of the Republic of Korea, which is the criminal charge of the Sacheon Police Station, and n.e., n., n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n. n.s. n. n. n.s. n. n.s. n. n. n.s. n. n.s. n. n.s. n.s. n. n.s. n. n.s. n. n.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Each statement of D and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to departments related to the report of 112 case;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, including the following facts: (a) the Defendant, who received a report on 112 report while drunk, has obstructed the performance of official duties by assaulting the police; (b) the police officer called out to the scene; (c) the developments leading up to the dispatch of the police officer; (d) the extent of the assault committed by the Defendant to G; (c) the receipt of a letter of confinement from the damaged police officer; and (d) the receipt of a fine other than punishment once, shall be determined as ordered

Public Prosecution Rejection Parts

1. The summary of the facts charged is that of the Defendant on September 5, 2019.