When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On April 21, 2014, from around 20:00 to around 21:50, the Defendant interfered with the business, at the entrance of the “E” restaurant operated by the victim D (E) who is located in the area of Cheongju-si, a considerable amount of 1 to 50 minutes, continuously sounded “E” with the victim “to pay the victim a pushed-in wage, and to live with it.” The Defendant interfered with the victim’s operation of the restaurant by force by allowing other customers to leave the restaurant, and by preventing other customers from entering the restaurant.

2. On April 21, 2014, at around 21:50 on April 21, 2014, the Defendant, who does not leave the restaurant, called “E” by entering the entrance of the victim D in the instant “E” restaurant with the entrance of the victim D to leave the restaurant and “I do not live, I do not live in the restaurant,” and the victim demanded several times from the victim to leave the restaurant floor for about 15 minutes, and the victim’s leaving the restaurant.

The Gu refused to comply with the Gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of the police interrogation protocol to D

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business, the selection of fines) and Article 319 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of non-compliance with retirement and the selection of fines) concerning the

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;