beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.10.28 2016고정2703

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person engaging in driving a Bknife car.

On February 8, 2016, the Defendant operated the 00:25 Fash Law School and made a left turn to the left at the front of Incheon Seo-gu, Incheon.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to make a left-hand turn after checking the right and the left-hand turn well before making a left-hand turn.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and proceeded along the same line from the Cheongcheon-dong to the east of the Cheongcheon-dong, and received the right-hand part of the E Laun-si from the front part of the car of the said blade, and caused the shock to the said blade-si, which was installed in India.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury, such as tear tear, etc. of knee-shnee-shacking kne, which requires approximately six weeks of treatment to the victim F (the passenger of the said taxi) who is the passenger of the said taxi due to the foregoing occupational negligence.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the express intent of the victim pursuant to the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning

However, according to the records of this case, the victim F's traffic accident agreement was submitted to the purport that the defendant does not want to be punished to this court on March 22, 2016, which was after the prosecution, and the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.