A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Defendant

A on March 17, 1972, A was sentenced to a fine of KRW 5,00,00 for gambling at the Chuncheon District Court on March 14, 1986, to a fine of KRW 300,000 for gambling as a crime of gambling at the Chuncheon District Court on March 14, 1986, to a fine of KRW 1,00,000 for gambling as a crime of gambling at the Chuncheon District Court on June 2, 1994, to a crime of habitual gambling from the first branch in the Chuncheon District Court on November 2, 1994, two years of suspended sentence for one year, to a fine of KRW 2,00 for gambling as a crime of habitual gambling at the Chuncheon District Court on May 9, 195, and to a fine of KRW 1,300,000 for one year, and one year, more than September 13, 2005, respectively.

On June 28, 2015, from around 23:30 on June 28, 2015 to around 02:00, Defendants A and C ambling the card when the number of the first seven pages of the same number or the number of the same in the same pattern is at least three consecutive times after having received the card using the card, and the person who first throw the card, and first throw the card, and the remaining persons chips (at least 1,000 won per one card) used in lieu of gold instead of gold under the remaining card to the winners in consecutive order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. C’s statement in the first trial record;

1. A written investigation of suspect of each police officer against E or A;

1. Each protocol of seizure (voluntary submission), each list of seized articles, photographs of seized articles, investigation reports (related to photographs of gambling sites and photographs of seized articles), and submission and forwarding (total list of seized articles, etc.);

1. Previous convictions in judgment: A written inquiry about criminal history and other inquiries (A);

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime, the number of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the repeated crimes of the same kind in the judgment;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Article 246(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act; Article 246(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act; selection of fines

B. Defendant B: Article 246(1) of the Criminal Act, and selection of fines.