손실보상재결처분무효확인등
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in cases where a part of the judgment of the court of first instance is modified or added as stated in the following paragraph (2). Thus, this is acceptable as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Parts used or added;
(a) 2nd and second to 10 pages “Defendant” shall be incorporated in Gyeonggi-do;
(b) The Central Land Tribunal of Second Instance 17 (hereinafter referred to as the “Central Land Tribunal”) shall be construed as “Defendants”, and each “Netop” of the Second Instance 19, third Party 4, 6, and 4, the fourth Party 17 shall be construed as “Defendants”.
C. Next, “The third party’s 3rd page” added “However, the Plaintiff did not raise an objection against the instant judgment.”
Part 3, "No. 10 and No. 11" (hereinafter referred to as "the ruling dated June 30, 2004") shall be construed as "the ruling dated October 19, 2004" (hereinafter referred to as "the ruling dated October 19, 2004"), and the ruling dated June 30, 2004 "No. 12 and No. 48" shall be construed as "No. 19, 2004."
3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.