Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

A. The reasons for the judgment of this court are as follows.

Inasmuch as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance except for addition or dismissal (the defendant asserts that the plaintiff cannot be deemed to have continuously resided in the apartment of this case as the reason for appeal, and thus, the plaintiff is not entitled to conversion for sale in lots. However, in full view of the evidence submitted to the court of first instance and this court, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance on this issue are deemed legitimate)

B. On October 3, 2018, part of the judgment of the court of first instance, which was added or used after being added, "O. 3, 2018" was added to "O. 30, 2018."

In the first instance judgment, the part of the “the fact of occupancy” in the first instance judgment from the 14th to the 15th “the Plaintiff prepared the occupant card of the instant apartment around November 26, 2014, and completed the move-in report to the domicile of the instant apartment on January 2, 2015,” and thereafter, the Plaintiff added “the fact that the Plaintiff opened the instant apartment in the name of his spouse via the Internet and cable broadcast on December 29, 2014, and continued to pay the said fees.”

Part 16 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the "period of occupancy" in Part 20 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be "from November 26, 2014 after the date on which the Plaintiff's occupant card was prepared."

Part 17 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "I am able to recognize" as "I am able to recognize", and thereafter, I am to read "I am see that it is difficult for the plaintiff to find out that other houses than the apartment of this case, other than the apartment of this case, have been engaged in daily life at this place of residence".

2. Conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.