beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.01.13 2016고합364

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(뇌물)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of four years and a fine of thirty-five thousand won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From around 1995 to August 2014, the Defendant worked as a public institution (entrusted-type quasi-governmental institution) under the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (entrusted-type quasi-governmental institution) and has been in charge of various support projects, etc. conducted in D while working as business support E and F.

1. The Defendant was working as D Business Headquarters Enterprise Support Office E from January 2012 to December 2012, and the Small and Medium Business Administration provided funding and public notice, and took charge of “G” business-related affairs that D evaluate and conduct.

In April 2012, the defendant requested that the representative director of the above company J in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government K apply for the business of the K K which has a patent in relation to the G business, and the K which the K which has the K which has a patent in the field of the G business will participate as a design cooperation company. In that case, the K which has the K which has the K which has the K which has the K which has the K which has the K which has the L which has the right to manage the business in question may be selected together by the K which has accepted it.

Since July 2012, the defendant was selected as a business promotion company with the K K of the K of the K of the K of the K of the K of the K of the K of the K of the K of the K of the K of the K of the K of the K of the K of the K of the K of the K of the K of the K of the K of the K of the K of the K of the K

Accordingly, the defendant, as an officer or employee of quasi-government agency who is deemed a public official, received 500,000 won in connection with his duties.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery) served as DF from January 2013 to August 31, 2014, and the Small and Medium Business Administration provided funding and public notice to the Small and Medium Business Administration, and took overall charge of management of the M business related to D’s evaluation and performance.

The defendant, around April 2014, at the first office of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., "The company "the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd." intends to apply for M business, and the plaintiff will participate in the M business as a design cooperation company. Accordingly, the defendant will help the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. and the I Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. to select the project in question together with the I Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., which will be approximately KRW 80,000,000 after D will be paid.