When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 14, 2019, around 10:30 on June 14, 2019, the Defendant interfered with the business of selling electrical products of the victim for about one hour by force, such as: (a) the victim embezzled the public funds of the Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Association for Epiton; (b) the victim embling the victim; (c) b) breathing the epibbb, etc.; and (d) preventing the customer from paying the payment by assaulting him.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C's written statement;

1. Application of 112 reported case handling lists and investigation certificates (to hear victim's telephone statements)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. On June 14, 2019, around 10:30 on June 14, 2019, the Defendant: (a) embezzled public funds provided by Jung-gu Seoul Central-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Victim C (the age of 69) to the Defendant; (b) embezzled public funds provided by Edridton C; and (c) expressed the victim’s desire to “Iskn’s fright and have no money repaid; and (d) assaulted the victim, who escaped from the Defendant, by using his/her her flap, with his/her son’s hand.

2. The facts charged above are those falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the express will of the victim under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

However, on October 11, 2019, after the prosecution of this case was instituted, the victim expressed to this court the intention that he does not want the punishment of the defendant. This part of the prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.