If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On June 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) received a report from 112 that the host was used in front of the Western Middle School located in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu; and (b) moved to the F apartment of the Defendant’s house, the office of the Defendant, by Cheongju-gu, Cheongdong-gu, Cheongdong-gu, Cheongdong-gu, Cheongdong-gu, Cheongdong-gu, Cheongdong-gu, Cheongdong-gu, Cheongdong-gu, and D.

1. On June 2, 2016, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, around 23:10, and around 106, the F apartment house 106, the Defendant: (a) went to the police officer who solicits him to return home; (b) “I am fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright,” (c) fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's 112 report processing and legitimate performance of public duties concerning the protection of people's lives and bodies.

2. The Defendant damaged public goods, as indicated in the above paragraph 1, was arrested as a flagrant offender who interfered with the performance of official duties, and the police officers resisted the Defendant on the E patrol vehicle and resisted the Defendant, and damaged the back glass of the patrol vehicle, which is an object used by the public office, by exposing back back glass of the patrol vehicle from the back seat to take back several times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to D or C;

1. 112 Reports on the settlement of cases, and the application of each photographic statute;

1. Article 136 (1) and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing criteria of the Supreme Court sentencing committee is not applicable to the case where a fine is selected for the crime committed by the defendant on the grounds of sentencing Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Details and results of the crime, degree of assault, contingent crimes, no criminal record for the same kind, compensation for damage, etc.