손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiffs' appeal and the selective claims added by this court are all dismissed.
2. After an appeal is filed.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this judgment is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is dismissed as follows. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Parts to be dried;
A. On the second 10th 10th 10th 10th 10th 2th 10th 2th 10th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 3th 2th 2th 2th 200, the part of the 3rd 3rd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 200
B. Each part of the 2nd, 17, 24, 5th, 22, and 18th, 6th, 17, 24th, 5th, and 6th, of the judgment of the first instance, shall be applied to the Plaintiff rink Capital.
C. Part 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance regarding “in accordance with the instant business agreement” was amended to “the agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant pursuant to the instant business agreement or the agreement made in the course of negotiations for the conclusion of the instant business agreement (hereinafter “the prior agreement”)”. D.
The part of the 6th 20th 20th 20th 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance, “in violation of this case’s business agreement or the plaintiffs’ assertion,” shall be applied.
E. According to the instant business agreement in Part 15 of the 7th judgment of the court of first instance, the part of the “instant business agreement” shall be applied to “the instant business agreement or the Plaintiffs’ assertion”.
F. Part of the “instant business agreement” in Part 19 of the 8th judgment of the court of first instance shall be applied to “by the instant business agreement or the Plaintiffs’ assertion.”
(g) Part 2(c) of the judgment of the first instance shall be written in the following manner:
C. The defendant shall pay A the purchase price of insurance to the defendant KRW 1.5 billion.