근로기준법위반등
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged is as stated in the facts charged (Provided, That the suspect is the defendant). 2. The judgment is a crime falling under Articles 109(1) and 36 of the Labor Standards Act, and Articles 44 subparag. 1 and 9 of the Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefits Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent in accordance with Article 109(2) of the Labor Standards Act and the proviso of Article 44 of the Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefits Act. In light of the records, the above two retired workers cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent. According to the records, the above two retired workers are dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, after the prosecution of this case was instituted (the Changwon District Court 2017 money 106757, July 19, 2017).