When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

"2017 Gohap 63"

1. On March 5, 2016, the Defendant committed the crime of March 5, 2016: (a) around 09:36, at the Defendant’s residence of Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu (Seoul) and 803, up to the Defendant’s “E” free bulletin board 1 of the Internet, posted “G” the victim H who connects to “F” and uses “G” as the clinic of “F”, “G shall live together with A’s residence for about two years from January 20, 2014 to November 29, 2015; and (b) Party A’s other party (the Prosecutor’s mother and woman’s male and female’s male and female’s remaining head) who continued to have been sent for about 13 years, and posted a false message on A’s behavior and false facts.”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly duplicating facts through information and communication networks with a view to slandering the victim.

2. 2016. 3. 12. 자 범행 피고인은 2016. 3. 12. 06:34 경 서울 성동구 D, 803호 피고인의 주거지에서, 인터넷 다음 카페 ‘E’ 자유 게시판 1에 접속하여 ‘F’ 이라는 닉네임으로 피해자 H을 가리켜 “G (H) 의 협박 편지는 적반하장의 극치” 라는 제목으로, “ 아래 내용 증명 발신인 H(G) 은 2016. 3. 4. 경 카페 운영자에게 폭언과 폭력을 행사한 행위 등으로 강 퇴의 결한 내용을 카페 공지한 사실에 대하여 무고죄로 고소하겠다는 등, 뻔뻔스럽게도 아래 내용과 같이 협박성 질의( 편지 )를 한 사실에 대하여 배은망덕, 적반하장의 극치라고 답변한다.

“.......”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly duplicating facts through information and communication networks with a view to slandering the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness H, I, and J;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police investigation report (No. 11 through 14 No. 14);

1. Two copies posted on the car page, certification of contents, car page.