청구이의
1. Compulsory execution against the Defendant’s Plaintiff based on the Daegu District Court Decision 2014Na1972 Decided June 15, 2016.
1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments as to Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (including various numbers), the above court rendered a judgment on June 15, 2016 as to the Daegu District Court No. 2014Na1972 case between the plaintiff and the defendant, "the plaintiff shall bear 21,561,90 won and 9,684,40 won among them, 15 May 16, 2013; 11,87,50 won with 60% per annum from May 16, 2013 to June 15, 2016; 30.6% per annum from the Daegu District Court No. 2057, Jun. 16, 2016; 30.36% per annum from the Daegu District Court No. 2057, Jun. 15, 2016; 16.75% of the total costs of the lawsuit and the remainder of the lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiff."
According to the above facts of recognition, since the defendant's claims against the plaintiff based on the judgment of this case and the execution expenses based on the judgment of this case are all extinguished by the deposit for repayment, compulsory execution based on the judgment of this case shall be dismissed.
2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.
However, the plaintiff applied for a compulsory auction against the defendant.