손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiffs' appeals and the claims added to the trial are all dismissed.
2. The costs of the lawsuit after the appeal are filed.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance that cited this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the following cases, the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act is cited on the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance, since the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act is the same as the main text of the judgment of the parties in the first instance, the facts of recognition in
The last two cases of the judgment of the first instance court are the same as “Embezzlemented or acquired without any legal cause.”
(b) treat the “Embezzlement” of the first instance judgment as “Embezzlement or unjust enrichment”.
(c) The 3rd 8th 8th ec.g. “Embezzlement” of the first instance court is regarded as “acquisition without any legal cause,” and the 9th ec.g. “compensation amount” as “compensation for damages caused by a tort or return of unjust enrichment.”
The 3th 13th 13th 13th mar of the judgment of the first instance shall be added to the account after the “self”.
E. The 6th 4th e.g., the judgment of the court of first instance is based on the evidence submitted by the plaintiffs, “ alone,” with each description and image of evidence A 3 through 8, 11 through 29.”
(f) Embezzlement “B” that embezzled for 6th half of the judgment of the first instance.
(g) “Embezzlement” is regarded as “Embezzlement or unjust enrichment” that was obtained without any legal cause. Ga. 6th 15th e.g., the first instance court’s “Embezzlement” is regarded as “Embezzlement or unjust enrichment.” (h) The 6th 18th e.g., and 7th 8th e.g. “Embezzlement” is regarded as “Embezzlement or unjust enrichment.”
2. Conclusion
A. The plaintiffs' claim for damages against tort should be dismissed in its entirety due to the lack of grounds. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed in entirety.
B. The plaintiffs' claim for return of unjust enrichment which is selected in the trial of the party is without merit, and all of them are dismissed.
C. It is so decided as per Disposition for more than one reason.