자동차관리법위반등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
[2014 High Court Decision 603]
1. At around 10:40 on November 29, 2013, the Defendant violated the Automobile Management Act, without registering with the competent authority, operated the automobile maintenance business under the trade name “D” located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, with materials necessary for the car seal, such as the three frames, 2-man-hour 1, 2-man-hour 2-man-ro, 1st-man-ro, 1st-man-ro, etc., machinery, paints, new car, etc., and repair the penter and the right side of the vehicle EK5’s right side, and received KRW 60,000,000 per month from the beginning of October 2013 to the above temporary date.
2. The Defendant in violation of the Clean Air Conservation Act did not report the installation of an emission facility of air pollutants to the competent authority, and from the beginning of October 2013 to November 29, 2013, the Defendant installed a vehicle painting room of approximately 65.4 cubic meters, which is an emission facility of air pollutants, in the foregoing D, and affixed a seal on the said vehicle on the vehicle requested by customers, by using the aforementioned machinery, materials, etc. necessary for the car painting.
[2014 High Court Decision 1397]
1. On March 19, 2014, the Defendant violated the Automobile Management Act, without being registered with the competent authority, operated the automobile maintenance business facility of the size of 60 cubic meters from the trade name “D” in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul, and carried out the automobile management business, such as Hadop (f money work: a paint work to prevent the infiltration of solvents and to improve the congestedness of solvents in the process of performing the work) on the right upper and rear door of the FST5 car that was requested to repair by customers.
2. The Defendant violated the Clean Air Conservation Act, without reporting the date, time, place, and air pollutants emission facilities in the preceding paragraph, and carried out operation using emission facilities as above.
Summary of Evidence
[2014 High Court Decision 603]
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1.Written statements, certificates of detection, photographs.