However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 21:50 on April 5, 2019, the Defendant: (a) tried to identify the personal information and circumstances of the case against the above C’s husband; (b) stated that the E and the security guards, who were known to and dispatched to the site after having received the above C’s domestic violence report; and (c) stated that the above police officers “I will know that I would like to know that I would like to know that I would like to know that I would like to know that I would like to know that I would like to be called “I would come home with I would go home with the right to do so; and (d) went off I would get off I and her clothes and body frighted by assaulting the police officers who were reported by I.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. C’s statement;

1. 112. List of reported cases;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing investigative reports (Attachment of dynamic images), screen pictures and video CDs by capturing a video;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Scope of punishment by law: One month to five years;

2. The scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines [decision of type] of the obstruction of the performance of official duties [Type 1]/ No person shall be subject to the obstruction of the performance of official duties [the scope of recommended and recommended punishment] (the scope of recommendation field and recommended punishment] basic area, six months to one year and six months [the general person who is sentenced to the suspension of execution] (the grounds for suspension of execution of punishment];

3. Upon receipt of a report, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, such as taking a bath to the police officer who was called out and taking a new post.

Defendant has been punished for each of the charges of injury around 1999, around 2010, around 2013, and in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (at night injury) around 2006, and there are other records.