except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 01:10 on November 17, 2013, the Defendant: (a) as a result of the computation of the drinking value with the victim due to the issue of calculating the drinking value, etc. while drinking the winter and drinking at D main points located in Sinpo City C, such as the victim E (the age of 44) at D main points; (b) brought the victim’s left head at one time due to beer disease, which is a dangerous object of chemicaling, and led the victim to the injury such as tearing the head in the number of days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the accused in the first protocol of trial;

1. Application of the law to the part of the protocol of interrogation of the police officer against the defendant (the second, the second, and the replacement)

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 201Do139, Jan. 1, 201; 201Do129, Feb.

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary Mitigation);