직업안정법위반
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (based on factual errors and misapprehension of legal principles) of the facts charged in the instant case and the facts charged in June 16, 2017, which were issued on July 14, 2017, and the facts charged in the summary order (based on the summary order issued on July 14, 2017) No. 2017 high-level 1198 (hereinafter “final summary order”) do not constitute a single offense.
2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the judgment of the court below and the court of this court, i.e., ① the Defendant’s criminal act of a conclusive summary order, “from May 201 to early July 201, 201, one of the first police officers operating a singing practice room,” and as a result, the Defendant offered free registration fee-charging job placement service by means of receiving 7,00 won out of personnel expenses of 25,00 won per hour he received from the singing practice room business owner, which is identical to the criminal act of this case, and ② the Defendant was investigated by violating the Employment Security Act even around February 2, 2017, and the Defendant appeared to have received an investigation by the investigative agency on the grounds that it was difficult for the Defendant to have received a false statement from the Switzerland District Prosecutors’ Office on May 31, 2017, on the ground that the Defendant’s criminal act of this case and the Defendant’s criminal act of this case, which was under the control of the Defendant’s news order, were changed from the investigative agency.