2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of 4,315 square meters of E-U.S. (hereinafter “instant land”) in Kimhae-si, and the Defendant is the owner of C large 559 square meters and D previous 496 square meters (hereinafter “Defendant-owned land”) adjacent to the north dong of the instant land.

B. At present, there is no passage between the land of this case and the public road, which is necessary for the use of the land, and each land owned by the Defendant is connected to the contribution of the North Dong-dong (hereinafter “instant contribution”).

C. In the past, the Plaintiff has entered the instant meritorious services through the farm road and H land made up near F, G and the land (hereinafter referred to as “existing passage”), and on the existing passage, the existing passage is in the state where iron pents are installed depending on the line connecting each point of F, G, and H, i.e., marking 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1-1 to Gap evidence 6, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 3, Eul evidence 3, the result of this court's verification, the result of a request for surveying and appraisal to the Korea Cadastral Corporation, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of claim

가. 원고의 주장 이 사건 토지에는 공로로 통하는 통로가 없으므로, 원고는 피고 소유 각 토지 중 별지 제1도면 표시 9, 15, 16, 5, 4, 9의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 ㈏ 부분 36㎡, 같은 도면 표시 2, 3, 4, 5, 2의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 ㈒ 부분 3㎡(이하 이를 모두 합하여 ‘제1도면 ㈏㈒ 부분 토지’라고 한다)의 폭 2.5m 통로를 통하여 이 사건 공로에 통행할 수 있는 민법 제219조의 주위토지통행권이 있거나, 적어도 별지 제2도면 표시 11, 17, 18, 7, 6, 11의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 ㈏ 부분 21㎡, 같은 도면 표시 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 2의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 ㈒ 부분 2㎡, 같은 도면 표시 3, 4, 5, 3의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 ㈓...