However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 23, 2015, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act from the Suwon District Court’s Eunpyeong site, and on February 3, 2016, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2 million as a fine for the same crime in the same court.

around 04:55 on October 7, 2018, the Defendant driven a DNA car with a blood alcohol content of about 0.079% while under the influence of alcohol from about 300 meters to around C of the same city.

As a result, the Defendant once driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again as a person who has violated the prohibition of drunk driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of the result of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal history records, inquiry reports, and investigation reports (verification of sound driving records);

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The execution of imprisonment with prison labor shall be suspended, taking into account only the fact that the defendant with the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act has committed an offense committed on two occasions, but an incidental disposition shall be imposed to prevent the second offense;