beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.12.22 2016고단2339

모욕등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around June 17, 2016, the Defendant insultingd the victim D, a police officer belonging to the Jeju Dong Police Station C District District of the Jeju Police Station, who is a police officer belonging to the Jeju Police Station, who works in the patrol room, at the same place where several people drink the alcohol in the library, in Jeju Island, at around 21:24 on June 17, 2016. The Defendant said the victim E, who was in patrol with the victim D, to mean the victim E as the victim E with the “Domine and Domine.”

Accordingly, the defendant insultd the victims openly.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and place as Paragraph (1) of the same Article, requested that the above security guards D, a police officer belonging to the Jeju Dong Police Station C District, disclose the Defendant’s personal information, but the Defendant rejected such request.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who said D, tried to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the crime of insult, told the said D itself of a large voice that “I am humbly,” and assaulted the said D’s part of the said D’ to be drinking once.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning crime prevention patrol and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of each fine for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendant committed each of the crimes of this case by insulting the members of the police officers working in patrol and the Cooperation Agency living safety council of the police station chain, and obstructing the performance of official duties by directly assaulting the body of the police officers who intend to arrest the Defendant, and thereby obstructing the execution of official duties. In order to establish the national legal order and eradicate the general public.