추심금
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
1. According to each of the statements and arguments stated in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the plaintiffs received each of the claims and collection orders (hereinafter "each of the claims seizure and collection orders of this case") against the defendant by the limited company H (hereinafter "the company of this case") as stated in the following table, and it is recognized that each of the above orders was served on the defendant who is the garnishee.
(Seoul Southern District Court) The case number (Seoul Southern District Court) creditor (the 201.29,950,820 on August 5, 2015, No. 2015, 2015, No. 2789,950,950, 820 on the claim amount (service date) of 2015, 12925, No. 2785, 205, No. 20745, 205, 207, No. 207465, 205, 207, 305, 205, 205, 207, 207, 205, 205, 305, 207, 205, 275, 207, 205, 305, 205, 275, 2016, 305, 205, 2646
2. The plaintiffs asserted that they have legitimate authority to collect the claims held by the company of this case based on the seizure and collection order of each of the claims of this case against the defendant. Thus, they claim against the defendant for the payment of the amount equivalent to each claim and damages for delay against each of the above amounts.
3. We examine the judgment, and the plaintiffs did not present any assertion as to the occurrence of the claim for the collection of seized property.
In addition, the part concerning the claims for the collection of seizure and collection of each of the claims in this case shall have ordinary attention.