도로교통법위반(음주운전)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The sentence of the lower court (one-year imprisonment) is too unreasonable as to the gist of the grounds for appeal.
2. Circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant reflects the crime, that there was no personal and material injury due to the crime of this case, and that social ties obviously exist, such as the booming of his wife, etc., but the fact that he committed the crime of this case again during the period of repeated crime, even though he had a number of punishment, including punishment, several times due to the same crime, was committed, is disadvantageous to the defendant.
In full view of the above circumstances and the sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the Defendant’s age, occupation, sex, environment, family relationship, circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, it is difficult to view that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.
Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.