The Defendant is a person engaged in driving CK5 taxis.

On March 7, 2018, the Defendant driven the above taxi around 15:43 on March 7, 2018, and driven the front road of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D in front of the road from the shooting distance of the urban railroad to the speed of one-lane, which is visible depending on the shooting distance of the urban railroad.

Since the place is where the center line of yellow solid lines is installed, there was a duty of care to thoroughly see the front city in the person engaged in driving service, to protect the tea, and to make a U-turn at the point where the U-turn is permitted.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and hered to the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle E (55 years) driving by the victim E (55 years) who was driving along the two lanes due to the negligence of the U.S. in the central line.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim by occupational negligence, such as the victim’s macy, which could not be known of the number of days of treatment, the Plaintiff suffered from serious injury to the victim, such as the victim’s flading-out transfusion out of a light-to-face in which there is no wound in two open areas, flading-to-face transfusion out of a light-to-face in which there is no wound in

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of the occurrence of E traffic accidents;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. A report on investigation (verification of the degree of injury);

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing vehicle booms and video CDs;

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing of imprisonment without prison labor, tried to engage in an internship with the central line, under the relevant legal provisions, Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Article 268

The victim entered the road to the accident before the right-hand;

Even if the defendant fulfilled his duty on the front time, it was possible to confirm the victim's erroneous part, and there was no obstacle that could interfere with the front time.

The victim seems to have been unable to avoid an accident with the defendant's vehicle that intrudes with his own central line.

The victim suffers from brain damage due to the above accident.