However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On February 19, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (measures taken after an accident) and the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) on the road: (a) on February 19, 2017, the Defendant driven a 3-laned road in front of the Dlocking Dlocking Station C at the Blocking-si, Cheongju-si, with a alcohol content of 0.152% in blood while under the influence of alcohol; (b) while driving a e-laned vehicle in the direction of the head of the city consular distance, while driving the e-laned vehicle in the direction of the second TM5 vehicle in the direction of the victim F of the signal traffic at the two-lane, the Defendant did not immediately stop the said M5 vehicle at the front and the front left-hand part of the vehicle above with the repair cost of approximately 1,260,825 won, and did not take necessary measures, such as making a stop immediately to verify the damage.

2. On February 19, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) (hereinafter “Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes”), around 22:14, 2017, driven a front road of the apartment house of lstm mm 128-9 in the Cheongbaek-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, with a speed of about 50km from the direction of the SK Haak factory, while under the influence of alcohol as described in the foregoing paragraph (1).

At the time, the road construction is at night and there is a temporary central separation, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle to prevent the accident by reducing the speed while driving the vehicle in a safe way.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was under the influence of driving of the Victim H(47) which was under way in the opposite lane due to negligence in failing to properly operate the operation system, and was led to the front part of the passenger car as above.

Ultimately, the Defendant, while driving a body car under the influence of alcohol that is difficult to drive in a normal condition, is driving the above body car and driving the car to the above H for about two weeks, such as the left-hand pipe salt bed, and the victim I who was on board the car driven by the above H (n.e., the victim I who was on board the car driven by the above H.