Nos. 1, 2, and 3, seized evidence from Defendant B, No. 8.

The Defendants, as a member of the organization that committed voice telephone fraud (one name hereinafter referred to as “Sphishing”), made false statements to the other party to whom the phone calls from a financial institution, misrepresent himself/herself to transfer money to the designated account designated by the one who received the loan, and Defendant A, according to D’s instructions, made the other party transfer money to the account designated by the one who received the cash card from the one who received the cash card from the one who received the cash card from the other. Defendant A, according to D’s instructions, took part in the role of transferring the money transferred to the another’s account designated by D, and Defendant B received approximately KRW 200,000 per day, and Defendant B, as a compensation for the amount equivalent to 1/100 of the withdrawn amount, and conspired with the other party to commit a voice telephone fraud.

Defendant

A, on August 24, 2014, under instructions from D through mobile phone hosting display system, A received Kwikset’s cash cards through Kwikset’s service in the vicinity of the subway No. 4 U.S. Station located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and around August 25, 2014, around 08:30 on August 25, 2014, delivered four copies of the cash cards delivered as above to Defendant B among the cash cards delivered to Defendant.

1. On August 25, 2014, at around 09:50 on August 25, 2014, the victim E calls to the victim E at a non-place, and “A loan of KRW 10,000,000 per annum 7.7% per annum is possible. If a loan is granted first, the guaranteed premium should be transferred first.” However, the statement of the fact is that the victim was not a modern capital employee, and the victim was not a guarantee insurance premium.