If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On June 28, 2014, around 01:50 minutes, the Defendant referred to D main points in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 1st century to E in the course of mobilization after receiving a report on D main points 112 that there is any time limit, and acted as drinking, with the Defendant’s desire to see why she would not be frightencing.”

Therefore, although the Defendant did not relate to the reported case, the Defendant continued to perform his bath, such as “Chewing,” to the above E, and interfered with the legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of the 112 reported case by a police official who leads about about 40 minutes of the body of the above E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports and telephone communications;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.