공무집행방해등
1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months.
However, this judgment has become final and conclusive against Defendant A.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a person who works on heating with the trade name of “D”, and Defendant B is an employee of the said “D”.
1. On February 11, 2014, the Defendant’s interference with Defendant A’s business: (a) found the instant singing practice room in the “G singing practice room” operated by the victim F (hereinafter “F”) located in Heung-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu; (b) but the victim’s face seems to be too difficult for him to confirm whether he is a minor; (c) shown the Defendant’s door that “I am off the floor by cutting off the door from all of the doors and cutting off on the floor; and (d) expressed the Defendant’s desire to read “I am, I am. I am. I am. I am. I am,” and (e) expressed the Defendant’s door that “I am. I am. I am. I am. I am,” and (e) took the part on the kingter, leaving the king room room, and am on the part of the victim, who was in the inside, and obstructed the said customer’s business by force.
2. The Defendants’ violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint injury) and the obstruction of performance of official duties at G K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K K KK on February 11, 2014, and Defendant A, who had been sent to the site after receiving the said F F K K K K K K K KK’s 112 report, the security guardsJ belonging to the K K K K K KK KK KK KKK HKK HK, and expressed the above police officers that “I want to take a bath for the said F, I am. I am. I am. I am. I am to this effect,” and the above police officers notified the above police officers that “I may be arrested and punished as a flagrant offender if I talked about a continuous disturbance and take a bath.” However, Defendant A expressed a desire to the above police officers more seriously without gathering it.
Accordingly, the above police officers attempted to arrest the defendant A as a flagrant offender first, and the defendant A was able to see the breath of the above I, and the head of the above I.