2. In light of the following facts: (a) there is no change in circumstances that may be considered in sentencing after the judgment of the court below; (b) there is no change in circumstances to consider the sentencing after the judgment of the court below; (c) the victim C who was in an internal relationship with the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case in order to arrange the relationship; (d) there is no circumstance to consider the circumstances of the crime; and (e) the defendant found the victim F, who was the husband of the above C; and (c) the defendant found the victim F, who was the husband of the above case, was her husband; and (d) the victim F, was her husband, and it seems that the victim F, who was her husband, might suffer from mental shock and insult; (d) the defendant sent to the mother of the victim C with the expression expressing the inane fact; (e) the victim C's family failure was caused by these acts; and (e) the defendant did not receive any use from the victims; and (e) considering various sentencing conditions in the records and arguments of this case, even

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.