Facts of recognition

In full view of the purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendants for the return of the above loan and the payment of the unpaid amount from September 2, 1995 to June 10, 1996, with the interest rate of 24% per annum without the time limit for repayment. ② The defendant Eul did not pay KRW 3,500,000 to the plaintiff from July 3, 1998 to April 3, 1999, and the defendant C did not jointly pay the above unpaid amount of KRW 150,000 to the plaintiff, and the defendant C did not pay the above unpaid amount of KRW 10,000 to the plaintiff from 10,000 to 10,000,000 to 105,000,000 to 20,000 won per annum 20,000 to 4,000,000 won per annum of this case.

The interest rate of 132,50,000,000,000 after making up for the balance of the principal due to the appropriation of performance (20% per annum) and the interest rate of 132,50,00,000,000,000 August 15, 2009 after making up for the balance of the principal due date of appropriation of performance (20% per annum), shall be 132,50,000 132,50,500,000 132,50,594,894,93921,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won per annum, and the interest rate of 132,50,000,000,0000 won per annum of the principal and interest of this case from the last 20,014,5,0105,005.

The theory of conclusion is based on the theory.