If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is the representative director of the C Co., Ltd. in the original city B, who employs 192 full-time workers and operates electronic parts manufacturing business.

On November 12, 2012, the National Labor Relations Commission rendered a review decision (reorder) on November 30, 201 that “the dismissal of 39 persons, such as D, was unfair,” and that “the reinstatement to the original position and the amount of wages paid” was “the dismissal of 39 persons,” and C Co., Ltd. filed an administrative suit against the Chairperson of the National Labor Relations Commission to seek the revocation of the decision on the review of unfair dismissal, and lost the said decision on December 10, 2015, which became final and conclusive on September 9, 2016, the Defendant failed to comply with the order for remedy against 4 persons, such as E, by the Supreme Court.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written adjudication, a written adjudication for review, each written judgment, and a report on the state of non-performance;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the details of non-compliance with Clabor Administrative Litigation Remedy Order;

1. Article 11 of the relevant Act concerning criminal facts, Article 111 of the Standards for Optional Labor, and Selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;