beta
(영문) 광주고등법원 2014. 10. 22. 선고 2014나11542 판결

[손해배상(기)][미간행]

Plaintiff, appellant and appellee

Plaintiff 1 and 18 others (Law Firm East, Attorneys Seo Jung-hee et al., Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Defendant, Appellant and Appellant

Republic of Korea (Law Firm Dongin, Attorneys Park Ba-han et al., Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Conclusion of Pleadings

September 17, 2014

The first instance judgment

Gwangju District Court Decision 2013Gahap10285 Decided April 29, 2014

Text

1. All appeals by the plaintiffs and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of claim

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiffs 10 million won with 5% interest per annum from January 1, 1978 to the date of pronouncement of the first instance judgment, and 20% interest per annum from the next day to the date of full payment.

2. Purport of appeal

A. The plaintiffs

The part of the judgment of the first instance against the plaintiffs falling under the part ordering payment shall be revoked. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiffs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 each 70 million won, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19 each of the above 60 million won to the plaintiffs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19 each year from January 1, 1978 to the date of the first instance judgment, and 20% per annum from the next day to the date of full payment.

B. Defendant

The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant shall be revoked, and all of the plaintiffs' claims corresponding to the above revocation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

The court's explanation on this case is identical to the reasoning stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing this as is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and all appeals by the plaintiffs and the defendant are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Tae Tae-tae (Presiding Judge) Kim Sung-ju