분배금 청구
1. All appeals by the plaintiffs and the defendant are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.
purport, purport, and.
1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s acceptance of the judgment is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal of each corresponding part as follows. Thus, this is accepted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
In addition to the statement as follows following the 4th class 16, the plaintiffs claim that the defendant should pay damages for delay for each of the above shares from February 19, 2013, which is the date when other clan members received shares from the defendant through a claim for share distribution, or from February 19, 2013, which is the date when the defendant received a notice from the plaintiffs demanding confirmation of facts about share distribution, but the plaintiffs' claim for share distribution is due when the plaintiffs claim for share distribution is made to the defendant. However, as seen above, the plaintiff's claim for share payment should be deemed due to the plaintiff's claim for share payment. Thus, the plaintiff's claim for share payment should be added to the statement as specified below in the 13th class after the 7th class of "No. 13th class of the 13th class of the 7th class of the 16th class of the 16th class of the 16th class of the 16th class of the 16th class of the 16th class of the 16th class of the above claim.
“”
2. In conclusion, each of the claims of the plaintiffs in this case is justified within the above scope of recognition, and each of the remaining claims is dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and all of the appeals by the plaintiffs and the defendant are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.