beta
(영문) 부산고등법원 (창원) 2018.01.11 2017나22646

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The defendants' appeal and the plaintiff's incidental appeal are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal and the incidental costs thereof shall be individually considered.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court of the first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the Plaintiff and the Defendants, as stated in paragraph (2) and paragraph (3), are the same as the part of the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for the case where the Plaintiff and the Defendants make an additional determination as to the assertion made in this court; and (b) thus, they are cited

2. On the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, 3 pages 11 to 15 shall be cut down as follows.

“E. On January 10, 2017, the General Disciplinary Committee of Public Educational Officials issued a three-month disciplinary measure of suspension from office against Defendant B, Defendant C, and D, on the grounds that the Defendants refused to recommend candidates without justifiable grounds and spread false facts in the entire faculty and academic world through the former e-mail and the former e-mail, thereby impairing the honor of the Plaintiff. However, on May 24, 2017, the Appeal Committee rendered a decision to revoke each of the above disciplinary measure on the grounds that the Plaintiff was subject to suspension from office for three months, Defendant C, and C, respectively, and Defendant C were subject to suspension from office for three months, suspension from office for the same reason, and Defendant C’s suspension from office for the same reason as the above general disciplinary committee again held on August 11, 2017.

[Attachment 4] 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance (Seoul District Court Jinwon Branch Decision 2017 High Court Decision 2773) is as follows. The defendant's request for formal trial against the summary order and the defendant's request for formal trial against the summary order is in progress at the same court 2017 High Court Decision 2017 High Court Decision 362) 14th 14th 14th 14th 4th 14th 14th 2 of the judgment of first instance.