However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 30, 2013, the Defendant: (a) while driving a BNF vehicle owned by the Defendant, caused an accident to conceal the bus; (b) but, on the grounds of drinking driving, the Defendant was unable to receive the vehicle repair cost from an insurance company; (c) had partially repaired the vehicle, and had intentionally caused a traffic accident and had the Defendant receive insurance money from the insurance company

On March 10, 2013, around 04:35, the Defendant: (a) got into the water industry while driving the said Bnictor vehicle from the common distance in Ansan-gu, Ansan-si; (b) caused a traffic accident that intentionally conceals the rear part of the D buses parked, and subsequently claimed KRW 45,120,000 to the Insurance Company for Damage Insurance Co., Ltd., Insurance Co., Ltd.; (c) however, the Defendant failed to pay the estimated insurance money, and subsequently failed to perform such obligation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of an investigation report (verification of the contents of the list of vehicles to be submitted by the complainants) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Articles 351 and 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act - The crime of this case is an intentional cause of traffic accident with a vehicle destroyed by a defendant, and the crime of this case is attempted to acquire insurance proceeds from an insurance company to commit an attempted crime, and the nature of the crime is bad - The method of the crime is very poor, such as manipulating the creation date of a video file in the course of obtaining insurance proceeds - In the second investigation by the prosecutor's office, the fact that the defendant continued to deny the crime before it is discovered that he/she operated the creation date of a video file for a black box box and video file - The fact that the attitude of investigating by the investigative agency was very poor (the reasonable circumstances) - The fact that the defendant has recognized and against his/her mistake other than the punishment once is imposed.