However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is an environmental manager who operates joint prevention facilities with wastewater discharged from nine companies, such as Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City C, in which wastewater flows.

On December 2, 2013, the Defendant installed a Tini-type hall that can discharge wastewater without going through the final outlet between the secondary treated water and the sloping tank in the wastewater prevention facilities. On May 9, 2014, the Defendant, through the above branches, installed a Tin-type hall that can discharge wastewater, and around May 9, 2014, COD 755.5g/l (5.8 times of permissible discharge standards), S25,820g/l (215.2 times of permissible discharge standards) 31mg/l (3m/l of 3m/l of 3m/l of 3m/l of 127.6m/l of 127.6m/l of 27m/l of 127m/l), 6.58m/g of 13m/g of permissible discharge standards (3ml-gl-gl-gl-gl-gl-gl-gl-gl. 13m.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of examination of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of evidentiary photographs and test results;

1. Subparagraph 3 of Article 76 and Article 38(1)2 of the former Water Quality and Aquatic Ecosystem Conservation Act (amended by Act No. 12519, Mar. 24, 2014); the choice of imprisonment with labor for a crime

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act that the Defendant discharges wastewater without going through the final outlet does not have a high impact on public health. However, the Defendant confessions and reflects the instant crime, and there is no record of suspended execution or more. The Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance leading to the instant crime, and circumstances after the instant crime, etc. shall be determined as per Disposition in consideration of the following factors: