2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

A. While working as an employee of the special lecture of the Bank of Korea, the Plaintiff was subject to an accident of collision on July 27, 2013, and was given medical treatment until August 31, 2014 by obtaining approval of the injury and disease of “burgical mination of the left-hand laver, mination of the left-hand laver, etc.”

B. On September 25, 2014, the Defendant issued a claim for the payment of disability benefits to the Plaintiff on September 25, 2014. ① With respect to the disability of the left bridge, class 9 of class 13 and class 14 and class 9 of class 13, “persons who remain after nephism in the national part,” and class 13 and class 9 of class 14, which are “persons after nephism in the national part,” and ② The nephical disorder falls under class 10 of class 14, which is “persons after nephism in the national part,” and “persons after nephism in the national part,” which are medically recognized as medically recognized as nephism such as nephical stress disorder caused by stress disorder and WIG disorder in the national part, ③ The vert and ebalone of class 14 of class 14 and 14 of grade 10 in the remaining parts of the verte body,” and each of grade 111 of grade ne 14.

C. The Plaintiff appealed and filed a request for review, but was dismissed, and the review was also dismissed.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 7, Eul 1 and 4, and the whole purport of the pleading

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is a chronic dynamic, not a mere dynamic, but a brupt 12-15, even if the instant accident is a brutous drug to alleviate the chronic pain of the brutosis that appears as a result of the brutivity examination, and a bruting drug to alleviate the chronic pain of the brutosis and the brutium generated after walking.

In other words, the pains, pains, and mental systems are paind.