beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.02.21 2017고단2707

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 2016, the Defendant: (a) opened a restaurant with the trade name “C” around August 2016; (b) was liable for a debt amounting to KRW 1,000,000; (c) brought investors in the name of “joint purchase business”; and (d) brought investors to collect money for investment.”

On August 2016, the Defendant calls the victim D at an infinite time and calls to the victim D at an infinite location, and sells the finites to the people who recruited the finites from the tri village by soliciting the joint buyers from the accident, the finites, etc. to the finites.

In order to make an investment in the joint purchase project, not only the principal but also the profits will be paid.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, even if the defendant receives money from the victim D in the name of the joint purchase business investment fund, he thought that he would use the money for the defendant's debt repayment and living expenses, and there is no idea to use it for the joint purchase business, so he did not have the intent or ability to pay the proceeds or principal to the victim D.

As above, the Defendant: (a) obtained the total sum of KRW 326,82,600 from victims on 109 occasions as shown in [Attachment Table 1] from around September 30, 2017, as well as from the time when he received KRW 700,00 from the victim D on August 7, 2016, and acquired KRW 326,82,60 from the victims on 109 occasions as joint purchase business investment expenses.

2. On January 201, 2017, the Defendant using a card was unable to purchase goods from “G” stores located in “G” stores located in “G” in F at all times, and the Defendant could not live in goods because money in Korea is integrated into joint purchase businesses.

First of all, the cost of the accident card shall be paid immediately to the person who is required to pay the credit card of the party.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the defendant did not actually engage in the joint purchase business, and some of the investment funds received from the investors in the joint purchase business is the defendant.