When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

around 16:30 on October 21, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the Art Center located in Mapo-gu Seoul, Mapo-gu 20-ro 28 (Large-dong); (b) the victim C (8) pushed a bicycle to the Defendant’s wife; (c) was able to see the victim’s hump; (d) hump the victim’s hump; (e) hump the victim’s hump; (e) hump the victim’s hump; (e) hump the victim’s hump; (e) hump the victim’s hump; and (e) hump the victim’s hump; and (e) hump hump hump k

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the witness D;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph and report on investigation (to listen to the statement by a shot phone);

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The judgment and the defense counsel on the assertion of the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act regarding the assertion of the Defendant and his defense counsel. The Defendant and the defense counsel did not constitute the assault of the Defendant, even if the Defendant’s act does not constitute the assault, since the Defendant’s act does not fall under the assault of the Defendant, and the Defendant’s act does not fall under the assault of the Defendant, and even if so, the Defendant’s act does not fall under the assault.

It argues to the effect that the act constitutes a justifiable act.

However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, if it is recognized that the defendant committed an assault against the victim as stated in the facts constituting a crime in the judgment of the court, and if the facts are found, the defendant's act constitutes a justifiable act because it has objective validity that can be acceptable in light of social norms.

Therefore, all of the above arguments are not accepted.