However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 2, 2012, the Defendant filed an application for assistance to the subject of the project with respect to the “project for modernization of livestock pens facilities in 2013,” which was implemented by the Korean Food & Agriculture Department of Agriculture and Forestry for the purpose of supporting funds for the improvement of livestock pens and livestock facilities at the Myeon Office located in Jinju-si, Jinju-si, and applied for new construction of livestock pens on the land owned by the Defendant.

On March 8, 2013, the Defendant, upon receiving the notification of the selection of the recipient of the project, came to know that the Defendant could receive approximately 30% of the total project cost by receiving the notification of the selection of the recipient of the project, filed a false report with the lower amount than the amount actually paid as the actual project cost, and received the higher amount than the subsidies to be paid according to the actual project cost as a subsidy.

Therefore, on December 2, 2013, the Defendant submitted a written claim for the payment of subsidies to the effect that “the payment of subsidies to the extent that the project was implemented,” at the Jinju-si Agricultural Technology Center, which is located in the early Dong-dong, Jin-si, Jin-si, Seoul, to the effect that “the payment of subsidies to the extent that the project was completed,” and that “the payment of the remainder of the subsidies was completed,” around May 2014, the Defendant submitted to the employees of the above Center, each of which “the payment of subsidies to the remainder was made, as a result, for construction costs, KRW 592,04,00 in total with respect to the above project.”

However, in fact, since the total construction cost actually paid by the defendant in relation to the construction work was KRW 467,462,00, 124,542,00 out of the total construction cost reported by the defendant in the victim's city was the amount calculated falsely even though it was not actually paid as the construction cost.

Nevertheless, as if the defendant actually paid 592,004,00 won in full by the above method, the defendant deceivings employees of the center and deceivings them, under the name of the defendant, as a whole subsidy for the total construction cost from the victim Jinju City.